![]() |
The Shawshank Redemption
Written/Directed
by Frank Darabon
|
1) Relate
what was discussed in class or the text to the screening.
Shawshank Redemption tells a spellbinding story that immediately
gained critical praise and draws audiences in to this day. Directed and written
by Frank Darabon the film actually bombed in the box office, earning roughly
half of its budget in the box office. It is one those films that can’t be
explained in the sense that it has received increasing critical acclaim over time.
The story is that of Andy Dufresne, a wrongly convicted banker who discovers
more about himself inside a prison than he ever did in the real world.
Alongside him in this journey is Ellis Boyd Redding or Red for short, a long
standing inmate who has spent a greater portion of his life within prison than out.
He seems to know the prison like the back of his hand, but is educated by Andy
on the merits of patience, hope, and beauty. Prison goes beyond being bound
within walls, and freedom is more than being physically unbound, the story
looks at how our mind can be the greatest prison or the most beautiful release,
it depends on your outlook.
2) Find a related
article (on the film, director, studio, actor/actress, artistic content,
etc.) and summarize the
content. You may use the library or the internet.
Still Finding Love in
'The Shawshank Redemption' 15 Years Later
By Andre Rivas
Rivas’ article
essentially discusses how the film has garnered a building amount of praise
over a long period of time, not unlike the patience of the titular film’s main
protagonist. While the film did receive a very respectable 7 academy nominations
it failed to win any awards during the Oscar season, but consider that it was
up against Forrest Gump. Rivas admits
that he is biased when rating the film and has always ranked it as one of his
favorite. He was even upset with Roger Ebert giving it 3 ½ stars in his review.
Years later Ebert would rank the film among his “Greatest Films of All Time”
list. The film was initially a critical success but has built a widening
audience through home video and DVD’s.
He goes on to discuss
how in his opinion, it is the powerful characters (despite what some may
consider typical archetypes) that really draw the film. Dufresne is quiet,
reserved, and enigmatic, while Red is the affable inmate who can get you
anything you want. There is the strict warden Norton who treats his inmates as subhuman, hiding behind his pious, a hypocrite to the end. Then there is Captain Hadley, the no-nonsense prison guard who will beat you senseless at a moments notice. Despite what some may consider trite characterization the film
shines and all the actors perfectly suit their roles. But what really makes
this film so memorable is its readily apparent message of hope in the face of
overwhelming despair, a notion any movie can relate to.
3) Apply the article to
the film screened in class. How did the article support or change
the way you thought about the film, director, content, etc.?
I completely agree
with Rivas’ take on the film. From the moment I saw the film I was endeared to
it. While Rivas may have considered the characters typical, I somewhat disagree
with his statement. It is easy to shoehorn characters into an archetype if you
look hard enough. What the film does, that so many others fail to do, is make
these characters real, relatable, or even despicable. The audience has the same
initial reaction to Dufresne that Red does: initially we see him as apathetic
or indifferent – even cold during his trial – yet we soon come to relate to
him. By films end we see he isn’t quick to show emotion but shows his character
through action. Funny enough he became more sociable in prison than he ever
would have on the “outside world”. The warden is loathsome, and despite his
outward pious he is a no better than many of the men he imprisons. We come to
like Red, and are as drawn to his gregarious nature as the members of his
“crew”.
What I can agree with
is Rivas’ take on the theme of hope. Audiences preferred the films ending over
the books, which comes as no surprise. The film leaves audiences questioning
Andy’s innocence yet we still empathize with him. After we know for a fact he
is innocent we hope he can somehow free himself of his situation. The
ending is the payoff for both Dufresne and audiences, He comes out on top and
one up’s his aggressors along the way.
4) Write a critical
analysis of the film, including your personal opinion, formed as
a result of the screening, class discussions, text material and the
article. I am less interested in whether you liked or disliked a
film, (although that can be part of this) than I am in your understanding
of its place in film history or the contributions of the director.
What draws most movie
goers into the film is the story of hope, redemption, and surmounting
overwhelming odds. The movie also has wonderful cinematography although it may
be lost on the typical movie. We can cite the famous shot of the prison itself
as the inmates are alerted to the alarm which signals the arrival of “fresh
fish”, but there is so much more to take note of. The main cell block (a
spectacularly built set) which houses the characters is a long narrow hall that
seems endless. We get these wonderful shots that frame the space just right which
makes it seem as if to goes on forever.
Then we have the use
of color pallets in the film. The majority of film uses cool colors giving off
an incredibly somber feel, even when they find themselves outside in the yard. The
atmosphere conveys the characters inner turmoil. In contrast, there are scenes
that embody hope that have warm colors, for example when Andy manages to get
his friends beers on the rooftop. They sit blissfully under the warm sun,
drowning away their dreary circumstances in alcohol and laughter, all the while
Andy has the most curious smile on his face. The music is perfectly
orchestrated to fit the mood of film as well. When a film has superb acting, a
strong plot, beautiful camerawork, and poignant music working in concert you
truly have something special. For me, the Shawshank
Redemption is that kind of film.
Plagiarism
Statement: Attach this to the end of every journal assignment.
CHECKLIST FOR PLAGIARISM
1) ( x ) I have not handed in this assignment for any other
class.
2) ( x ) If I reused any information from other papers I
have written for other classes, I clearly explain that in the paper.
3) ( x ) If I used any passages word for word, I put
quotations around those words, or used indentation and citation within the text.
4) ( x ) I have not padded the bibliography. I have used
all sources cited in the bibliography in the text of the paper.
5) ( x ) I have cited in the bibliography only the pages I
personally read.
6) ( x ) I have used direct quotations only in cases where
it could not be stated in another way. I cited the source within the paper and
in the bibliography.
7) ( x ) I did not so over-use direct quotations that the
paper lacks interpretation or originality.
8) ( x ) I checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have been
fully transparent about the research and ideas used in my paper.
Name: Benjamin F. M. Novoa
Date: 4/5/2014






No comments:
Post a Comment